If
you are a property owner and would like to have a clear understanding of when
best to buy or sell, there are certain key macro-economic trends to keep a
careful watch over. The micro-elements we as sellers have control over relate
to the presentation and quality of the property and the marketing over the
seasonally best time of the year. Timing a sale is more important in areas with
large seasonal climate variations, such as Gauteng and Cape Town, and less
important in areas with low seasonal climate variations, such as KZN. Many
would claim that selling a property in May in KZN, especially along the coastal
regions, is in fact better than mid-summer. These aspects can have a significant
impact on the salability of any particular home, but the general market trend
and cycle have an arguably more profound impact. Buyers are best equipped to
commit to a property when they have access to readily available mortgage funds,
when the cost of this is relatively low, when they have the capacity to take on
and service debt and when they are feeling up-beat and confident about their
future prospects. Economists measure these drivers of buyer behavior and report
them as GDP growth as a measure of general economic activity, residential
mortgage credit growth, the prime interest rate, the household debt and
disposable income ratios and the household sector debt service risk index.
Considering the measurements of these key statistics provides us with excellent
insight into the state of the property market and what can reasonably be expected
within the medium term.
Hot
of the press is the FNB published analysis of the household sector debt-service
risk index. This index measures, on a scale of 1 to 10, the vulnerability of
the country’s household sector when it comes to being able to service its debt
in the future. This brilliant predictor of the financial resilience of
households is compiled from the household debt-to-disposable income ratio, the
trend in the debt-to-disposable income ratio, and the level of interest rates
relative to the long term average consumer price inflation. As you can imagine
the higher an individual’s (or the country’s household sector as a whole) debt-to-disposable
income ratio, the more vulnerable the individual or household sector is to
unwanted “shocks” such as an interest rate hike or downward pressure on
disposable income due to unemployment or declining economic activity. The 4th
quarter measurement of this index is 6.55 which remains high relative to the
long term average of 5.2. It remains high largely because the indebtedness risk
of households remains high. This remains high because our overall household
debt-to-disposable income remains high at 75.8%. Interest rates remain at
historical low levels with the prime interest rate at 8.5%, down from its more
recent peak of 15.5% in 2008. When interest rates are low however, the risk is
that they will increase making households more vulnerable. FNB predict that
interest rates have room to move upwards, but caution that any increase above
12% would be met with severe financial pain given the current household debt
levels.
As
a property professional, what has fascinated me is the change in household
credit growth. Residential mortgage credit growth and non-mortgage household
credit growth moved predictably in tandem from 2002. However, from January 2010
the growth in non-mortgage credit growth has been exponential and is currently
at 23.29%, while mortgage credit growth has declined to the lowest levels over
the same period and are currently 1.25%. This alarming growth in unsecured
lending, with banks such as African Bank and Capitec leading the charge, has
been severely criticized by economists and government alike. In a Financial Mail
lead story published on 14 Feb 2013, the question was raised on the
sustainability of African Bank’s business model and reported that the National
Credit Regulator had made an allegation of reckless lending against African
Bank and requested that the Consumer Tribunal fine the company R300m. Finance
Minister Pravin Gordhan is equally concerned about the low rate of mortgage
growth, which is viewed as lower risk positive lending as it finances assets
that tend to grow in value over time, while at the same time witnessing the
more risky unsecured lending growth. Gordhan has reportedly engaged with the
banking sector to discuss these issues. This is important as mortgage growth
underpins the residential property market.
(Author: Andreas Wassenaar, published in The Ballito, April 2013)
No comments:
Post a Comment